Categories
Uncategorized

Review: 奶泵

手動定電動?

其實取決於你有多少堅持直從接乳房餵。如果您打算九成時間親養咁就平平哋買個手動或單邊電動都OK。但如果你想泵多D出來有人幫手餵下BB咁我覺得應該買一個好嘅雙電泵。會慳好多時間同埋令泵奶冇咁厭惡性。

電泵有平有貴. 取決於佢摩打嘅吸力同頻率. “醫院等級”有較高的吸力,但大同重兼好鬼貴。養和嗰部Medela Symphony如果自己買要15000+,租都要2500一個月, 所以生完應該去試試!

自己買當然唔使買咁貴,大多數人使用便攜式的貪佢攞出街都方便D。“Medela Freestyle”是最常見的牌子,水貨大約3K. 行貨好像5K. 我自己有呢嗰,好處係舒服(有按摩MODE)同舊電可以LAST好耐。其他常見有 Philips Avent Double Electric Pump。佢平D同出名舒服但要插電無得攞來攞去。行貨好像3K, 美國買200USD

另外好多香港媽媽都會用一個叫SPECTRA嘅韓國牌子。最常見的MODEL有9+(好似FREESTYLE咁便攜式) 或S1+/S2+ (大舊D, 但屬於“醫院等級” 所以可以更短的時間泵完) 。我自己有9+,覺得泵得比Medela Freestyle快, 但冇咁舒服同埋舊電泵3-4次就要叉。同埋上網睇較多人話會壞機,不過我嗰個用咗5MONTHS好彩運作良好。最好嘅就係價錢: 9+大約1.1K, S1+大約1.6K, 比Medela/Philips 同級平好多。如果我要再買,我應該會買一部S2喺屋企用。 You can buy this brand on a shop called Baby Boss Outlet. http://www.babybossoutlet.com/index.php?route=product/search&filter_name=spectra

Categories
Uncategorized

Perfect Wedding Song

This recently came up in my playlist… haven’t heard this song for quite some years (maybe 5? The last time I remember listening to it was at Soul2Soul tour in Rochester)

 But listening to it made me think… this is such a perfect wedding song…

[kml_flashembed movie=”http://www.youtube.com/v/ohC7o_PPPtY” width=”425″ height=”350″ wmode=”transparent” /]

Categories
Uncategorized

Long line at starbuck

Categories
Uncategorized

Taiwan

Went on an impulsive trip to Taiwan.

Not much to do in Taiwan except eat! So here are a few snaps of foodie delights…

Shaved Ice

To clarify, I did not have the big chunk of stuff in the middle of the first picture – can you guess what it is? Its Pigs Blood with sticky rice … blood is just not my cup of tea…

Categories
Uncategorized

叮!

很久未坐過叮叮。今日難得下班還天亮!

Categories
Uncategorized

Bangkok!

Categories
Uncategorized

Feels like…

Today is one of those gloomy days where its only 6 but it feels like its 9. Means the feeling that the day is about to end is longer than it should be. Temperature is tinted with a hint of autumn breeze, but yet combined with the lingering summer rain. Not a perfect picture.

That led me to think – does “feels like” ever lead to any good? Often, when you feel like something, it deviates from what you should do or what is the easiest path to go about. I feel like an icecream – but i should be on a diet. I feel like watching TV – but I really should do some work. The word “feel like”, although not negative on its own, is often used to describe things that theoretically is not the best… am I right?

Anyway,  that was my random TOT… thought I would share. =P

Categories
Uncategorized

Europe…

*Must* make it to Europe next year. Got this strong urge/craving to to to this seemingly romantic part of the world to visit some dear old friends.

Categories
Uncategorized

I like this article… i think its romantic… ><

Copied from facebook =P

Barack and Michelle: a Chicago love story

Barack Obama has dazzled with soaring rhetoric, bold policies and the energy of youth – but his public displays of affection for Michelle and his children have touched millions in more emotional ways. Now the First Couple look set to become the most romantic ever to lead America

* Gaby Wood in New York
* guardian.co.uk, Sunday November 9 2008 00.01 GMT
* The Observer, Sunday November 9 2008
* larger | smaller
* Article history

Barack and Michelle Obama and their two children eat at a restaurant in Pueblo, Colorado

Barack and Michelle Obama and their two children eat at a restaurant in Pueblo, Colorado. Photograph: Joe Raedle/Getty images

At 8 o’clock last Monday morning, the day before he was to become President-elect, Barack Obama learned that the woman who had raised him was dead. Less than two weeks earlier, he had interrupted his presidential campaign in order to visit his ailing grandmother, Madelyn Dunham – known as ‘Toot’ – in Hawaii and her death left him too overcome to announce the news. It was only late in the day that he told crowds she had ‘gone home’ and praised her as ‘one of those quiet heroes that we have all across America’. In the elation of the days that followed, one small yet magnificent detail retained its resonance: Madelyn Dunham had voted by absentee ballot and her vote had been counted.

Though his first bestselling memoir was entitled Dreams From My Father, Obama’s upbringing was governed far more by women: his mother (who died in 1995), his half-sister, Maya Soetoro-Ng, and their grandmother, with whom he lived from the age of 10. In a new preface to that book, he wrote: ‘Had I known that [my mother] would not survive her illness, I might have written a different book – less a meditation on the absent parent, more a celebration of the one who was the single constant in my life … In my daughters I see her every day … and I know that what is best in me I owe to her.’ He is surrounded by women still: his wife Michelle, his daughters Malia and Sasha, Auma Obama, the half-sister he met after their father’s death in 1982, and Michelle’s mother Marian, who has looked after his children during the long campaign. In other words, the President-elect is a man for whom women are the past as well as the future.

Of these, the most striking to the American electorate, of course, has been Michelle Obama, both in her own right and for what she reveals about her husband’s character. Together, they present the most collaborative, romantic, intelligent and relaxed couple that has ever been anywhere near the White House.

A high-powered Chicago lawyer three years his junior who met Obama when she was assigned to be his mentor at a Chicago law firm in the summer of 1988, Michelle has done a great deal to win him the all-important female vote. It was not always clear that this would be the case. Early in the campaign, her jokey asides about her husband’s domestic habits were considered a liability by Obama’s strategists. Did voters really need to know that the candidate had bad breath in the mornings, or that he once rushed out of the house and left his wife to deal with an overflowing lavatory? Michelle Obama quickly got the message and toned down the details, but for a while we had the privilege of seeing the couple’s raw banter in action and it was very funny.

At times, Obama can seem cocky: from the start, he incited the kind of mobbing usually reserved for rock stars (one aide had to stop Democratic committee delegates from pulling his shirt out of his trousers) and he’s not shy of referring to his own good looks. On one occasion, when asked – as Bill Clinton famously was – whether he wore boxers or briefs, he replied: ‘I don’t answer those humiliating questions. But whichever one it is, I look good in them.’ It’s perhaps no bad thing that his wife is in the habit of taking him down a peg or two.

More fundamentally, Obama could not have run had it not been for his wife: he has specifically said she had the power of veto. ‘Her initial instinct was to say no,’ he told Newsweek recently. She worried that those supporting his candidacy might be ‘setting him up’ and, indeed, the physical risks to a prospective African-American President were considered so great that Obama had secret service protection earlier than any other candidate in history. Eventually, Michelle made a deal with him. If he ran for office, he’d have to do something for her: give up smoking. Later on, this became another example of the strength of her character rather than his. Asked if Obama ever wore a nicotine patch, Michelle’s brother, Craig Robinson said: ‘Michelle Obama: that’s a patch right there!’

In his second book, The Audacity of Hope, Obama writes that: ‘If I ever had to run against her for public office, I know that she would beat me without much difficulty. Fortunately for me, Michelle would never go into politics.’ Given how familiar the Clinton marital dynamic is to American voters, this assertion is significant. For while Michelle Obama presents a formidable intellectual challenge to her husband (‘You want to know how Barack prepares for a debate?’ she asked Jay Leno, ‘He hangs out with me’), she is not competitive with him. As a couple they are, one campaign worker has said, ‘almost telepathic’, and certainly such public displays of private affection as they have offered have not existed in politics for decades.

Repeatedly, before tens of thousands of people, they have shared slyly affectionate looks or gestures that, despite their waves to the crowd, seem intended only for each other. They are an incredibly solid political proposition, yet it’s the intimacy beneath the surface that’s striking. Obama once touchingly wrote that despite Michelle’s fast-track, tough woman plans, ‘there was a glimmer that danced across her round, dark eyes whenever I looked at her, the slightest hint of uncertainty, as if, deep inside, she knew how fragile things really were.’ Even television cameras pick up on such undercurrents now – not the content of their unspoken messages, but the fact that much more is going on than a public performance. It’s rare to see such a bond in politics – or anywhere else. The Obamas have the devotion of Paul Newman and Joanne Woodward, and the glamour of the Kennedys.

When Obama said, via video-link after Michelle’s speech at the Democratic National Convention, ‘Now you know why I asked her out so many times, even though she said no’, he was really speaking directly to her – though he added, for our benefit: ‘You want a persistent President’.

When we hear that he insisted, in the middle of his presidential campaign, on coming home to take her out to dinner on their wedding anniversary, it seems crazy yet appropriate, just as it’s unsurprising to know that Cindy McCain’s parents buy her birthday presents and sign them from John McCain because he’s usually too busy to remember. And when we learn that on their first date Barack and Michelle Obama saw Spike Lee’s Do The Right Thing, it sounds just right that that vigorously scripted call for future unity should have kicked off two decades and counting of the relationship between America’s first African-American President and the woman he calls ‘my best friend’ and ‘the love of my life’.

On 3 June, just before Obama accepted his party’s nomination for President, Michelle accompanied her husband on stage. She looked commanding, beautiful and athletic. As she left to join the crowd, she gave her husband a knowing look, and, in a savvily ‘street’ gesture of solidarity, pressed her fist against his. To their critics this would become a ‘terrorist fist jab’; to everyone else it revealed enormous romantic and co-operative power. She turned. He instinctively put his hand on her lower back – almost her bottom. When she came back to the stage after his speech (‘This was the moment, this was the time, when we came together to remake our great nation…’) they embraced, she applauded and she mouthed the words: ‘I love you’. His smile was dazzling – more dazzling even than that of last Tuesday night, when the Obama family emerged victorious in Grant Park, Chicago, and the new First Couple exchanged a glance of cautious jubilation as they walked toward the podium, and the 10ft walls of bullet-proof glass.

Last September, Michelle Obama addressed a Women for Obama rally in North Carolina. ‘Between now and 4 November,’ she said, ‘the leadership of women is going to be absolutely critical to the outcome of this election – and thank goodness, because women get it done!’

Why, you might ask, is the female vote so significant? To begin with, more women than men have voted in every American election since 1964. More new registered voters are women every time and, perhaps most crucially, more undecided voters are women. Though women traditionally tend to lean Democratic, a Pew Research Centre poll released as late as 24 October found that 60 per cent of all undecided registered voters this time were women.

This election saw the first female candidate for the presidency and the first female candidate for the vice-presidency. The campaign was exceptional for what Hillary Clinton’s biographer Judith Warner has described as ‘the woman thing, in all its pretty girl versus smart girl iterations’. Barack Obama had to make sure he didn’t lose women who might have voted Democrat to the Republicans’ late arrival, Sarah Palin, and he also had to woo embittered former Clinton supporters who wished Hillary had been the Democratic nominee.

To some women, Obama’s nomination looked like a defeat for women, a thwarting of the chance to have a female President. In many ways, he had a long road to persuasion. But he began early. On the night of the Iowa caucuses, Clinton’s chief strategist, Mark Penn, and her loyal fundraiser, Terry McAuliffe, who had been certain their candidate would win by 10 points, were shocked when they saw how she was defeated. On the miserable flight back to their New Hampshire headquarters, McAuliffe said to Penn, incredulously: ‘Mark, we lost women.’

Even good friends of Obama were initially Hillary fans. Marni Willenson, 39, an ex-colleague of his who is now a lawyer in Chicago, says she ‘found it hard to vote against a woman running for that office. I thought Hillary was fantastic – but I didn’t have the sense that she was going to be better for women. She would break a glass ceiling, but Hillary’s is the be-one-of-the-guys story. Michelle’s story, and her relationship with Barack – basically her life: that strongly spoke to women of my generation.’

Eight-five per cent of Hillary’s voters ended up voting for Obama and Willenson believes that one of the most compelling things about him is ‘who he chose to marry. Michelle is not just a smart woman, she’s been a provider for the family. She was working full-time throughout her career, so he’s aware of the conflict, the difficulty that working women face.’ Willenson recalls: ‘I was about 20 yards from the podium at the victory speech, and to see the four of them stand there, I mean it gave me goose bumps. Obviously on a personal level, it is a tremendous impact: it’s probably not the life Michelle imagined for herself, and there are sacrifices she’s made – for all of us.’

Speaking to the assembled crowd in North Carolina in September, Michelle Obama argued that ‘women need an advocate in the White House now more than ever before’. She and her husband had sat at round table discussions all across the country over almost two years, she said, and ‘every woman on every panel is the face of the challenge in America today’.

Now that they have an advocate, what will he do? The day after Barack Obama won the election, his office posted on its website, change.gov, a detailed agenda for women that includes fighting ovarian cancer, supporting stem cell research, preserving the right to choose on abortion, strengthening domestic violence laws, fighting for pay equity and caring for women veterans.

Three days after his victory, an article on the front page of the Chicago Tribune photographed him coming out of a parent-teacher conference and suggested that, as President, Obama would need time to attend his daughters’ soccer practice and dance recitals. ‘That’s going to be a priority for him,’ a former aide said. There have been young children in the White House – the Kennedys, for instance, and more recently Amy Carter – but none has been the product of such a modern co-parenting structure.

While Michelle Obama has described herself as ‘Mommy-in-Chief’, she has also said that it’s her husband’s mission to give his daughters something he never had: ‘the affirming embrace of a father’s love’. Ever since he was elected to the Illinois State Senate, which sits in Springfield, in 1996, he has had to spend a lot of time away from home. Dramatic as his presidential victory is, it may be less of a strain on the family than the past few years have been: they will be together again and they’ll set a new standard, not just for women, but for equality.
The Great White House Couples

John and Jackie Kennedy

Though their wedding was the social event of the year, he was a notorious womaniser and they briefly separated. Attractive and youthful with a young family, they were America’s fairytale couple. Despite strains on their relationship, Jackie’s actions immediately following his assassination spoke powerfully of their deep bond. After scrabbling in the car to retrieve part of his skull, she refused to change her blood-stained clothes, and still wore the soiled pink Chanel suit as she stood next to Lyndon B Johnson on board the plane when he took the oath of office as President. ‘I want them to see what they have done to Jack,’ she said.

Abraham and Mary Lincoln

Profligate, quarrelsome, from southern heritage and prone to mental instability, Mary Todd Lincoln was not terribly popular with the public and considered a liability. But Lincoln was devoted to her. He once said: ‘My wife was as handsome as when she was a girl. And I, a poor nobody then, fell in love with her and, what is more, have never fallen out.’ He gave her a wedding ring engraved with the words ‘Love is eternal’. If proof were needed of their enduring love, she was holding his hand in the theatre when he was shot in April 1865.

George and Martha Washington

A widow when she married George Washington, Martha opposed his election as President and refused to attend his inauguration. Preferring to describe herself as ‘an old-fashioned Virginia housekeeper’, she was uncomfortable in her role as the USA’s First Lady. When he died, she was too upset to attend his funeral, and lived her last grief-stricken days as a virtual recluse.

Bill and Hillary Clinton

Probably the most publicly dissected relationship since that of Abraham and Mary Lincoln. Many have struggled to understand their marriage given the allegations of infidelity and Bill’s public grilling over the Lewinsky affair. Yet it has endured. Asked why she remained with him, Hillary said: ‘I never doubted Bill’s love for me, ever.’

Ronald and Nancy Reagan

Described by Charlton Heston as ‘the greatest love affair in the history of the American presidency’, the two were rarely photographed without holding hands or embracing. Though Nancy was often depicted by the media as domineering and ambitious, this clearly was a mutually adoring 52-year marriage. He called her ‘My mummy poo’ in letters signed from ‘poppa’ . She said: ‘My life began with Ronnie.’ In an emotional letter to America after his diagnosis with Alzheimer’s, he wrote: ‘I only wish there was some way I could spare Nancy from this painful experience.’ Friend Michael Deaver said: ‘You would do just as well to come between a bear and its cub than between Nancy and Reagan.’

Categories
Uncategorized

I’ve always associated myself with more of a lefty than a righty. I am not too sure why – perhaps because my dad was always passionate about democracy, always voted for the “民主派”. – Or perhaps its the innate jealously of the wealthy, and the secret desire to make them suffer and pay more taxes, I don’t know.

So I spent most of the day listening to the coverage of Obama winning the presidency. It wasn’t nearly as exciting as it was 4 years ago, when I was actually watching in my apartment on 117 Oak, and Prudence was happy with Bush’s victory due largely to the appeal of the Republicans to Christians and Conservatives. I remember being pretty disgusted… after 4 years of Bush, you want more??? 8 years ago I remember watching in Hong Kong when we still had CNN… Gore Gore Gore! It was all very exciting, with the recounts and all. I do think the American voting system is somewhat flawed… why can’t they just do it by raw counts and forget this whole state electorate BullShit?

Anyhow, although I am a Hilary Supporter, there is no doubt that Obama is indeed charismatic. Many times listening to his speeches I get somewhat teary eyed, even though there is supposedly nothing that resonates to me – I am not an American, I am not black, and I don’t particularly need to fix the US economy (except that the US economy is the world economy)  – yet everything he says sends a tingle down my spine. I suspect it is the sentiments of many others, from the celebrations around the globe (today is a public holiday Obama Day in Kenya, wtf). And it makes me wonder – how did he learn to be so charismatic? I was listening to how his wife Michelle became attracted to him in the first place – Yes, alot of people can do Corporate America, stand up, in a suit, look professional etc. (I can’t even do that). But Obama has a way to appeal to both – the rich and the poor, the old and the young, the asians, blacks, latinos, and the whites. I wonder what part of his upbringing gave him his incredible talent of bringing hope to masses.

Right after the election he begins to tone down the hope imposed on him. Obviously it will take a while to fix, but not everyone understands this fact. People are impatient. People want a miracle drug. I sincerely hope that he can somewhat live up to his charisma and not lose the presidency to the republicans in 4 years time.

And I also sincerely hope that he does not get assassinated, which I think is rather likely. After all, I’m not entirely convinced that all racial barriers have been broken in America.